Golf Ball Compositions

ABSTRACT

Golf balls consisting of a core and a cover are disclosed. The core is a solid, single-layer core formed from a rubber composition comprising a base rubber and a benzoquinone. The core has a positive hardness gradient such that the difference between the core&#39;s surface hardness and the core&#39;s center hardness is 25 Shore C units or greater and/or the core has a diameter of from 1.51 inches to 1.59 inches.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/047,982, filed Mar. 13, 2008. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/370,733, filed Mar. 7, 2006. The entire disclosure of each of these references is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to golf balls comprising a core and a cover. The core is a single, solid-layer formed from a rubber composition comprising a benzoquinone.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Benzoquinones

The use of benzoquinones in rubber-based golf ball compositions is known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,339,119 to Ladd et al. discloses a golf ball containing a cover layer and a core layer, where the core layer is molded from a scorch retarding composition comprising a scorch retarding peroxide, an elastomeric polymer, and a crosslinking agent. The scorch retarding peroxide typically contains a free radical scavenger selected from the group consisting of benzoquinones, hydroquinones, phenols, benzaldehydes, cyclohexadiene-1-ones, and mixtures thereof. The amount of the free radical scavenger in the scorch retarding peroxide is preferably from about 0.01 parts to about 2 parts per 100 parts of the peroxide by weight.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,940 to Voorheis et al. is directed to a golf ball having a core and cover, particularly to a golf ball core formed from a composition including an elastomeric polymer, a free radical initiator, and at least one stable free radical. The composition can further include one or more free radical scavengers and scorch retarders to increase the scorch time of the elastomeric polymer. Suitable free radical scavengers include benzoquinones; hydroquinones; phenols; benzaldehydes; cyclohexadiene-1-ones; and mixtures thereof.

U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0213442 to Bulpett et al. discloses the use of benzoquinone-containing rubber compositions in a variety of golf ball layers.

Additional background references include U.S. Pat. No. 6,919,393 to Mano et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,956,128 to Higuchi et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0052253 to Fushihara et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,488,597 to Iwami et al.

Resilient Cores

The primary source of resilience, as measured by coefficient of restitution (“COR”), in commercially available golf balls is polybutadiene rubber, which is generally used to form all or part of the core. It is known that the resilience of a golf ball core, at a given compression, may be increased by forming a core layer from a rubber composition comprising an organosulfur compound. However, organosulfur compounds can be expensive and can cause processing difficulties.

While the use of benzoquinones in rubber golf ball compositions has been disclosed, there is a need in the industry to broaden the applicability of such compositions to particular golf ball constructions having desirable spin, feel, and distance properties. The present invention provides such golf ball constructions through the use of a solid-single layer core formed from a rubber composition comprising a benzoquinone.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a golf ball consisting of a core and a cover. The core is a solid, single-layer formed from a rubber composition comprising a base rubber and a benzoquinone. The core has a center Shore C hardness (H_(CENTER)) and a surface Shore C hardness (H_(SURFACE)), such that H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧25 Shore C units.

In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a golf ball consisting of a core and a cover. The core is a solid, single-layer core having a diameter of from 1.51 inches to 1.59 inches and formed from a rubber composition comprising a base rubber and at least 0.15 parts by weight of a benzoquinone per 100 parts of the base rubber.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Golf balls of the present invention include a solid, single-layer core enclosed by a cover. Thus, golf balls of the present invention include two-piece (i.e., solid core and a single-layer cover) and multi-layer (i.e., solid core and a dual- or multi-layer cover) golf balls.

The solid, single-layer cores disclosed herein consist of a single, unitary layer, comprising the entire core from the center of the core to its outer periphery. Solid cores of the present invention are formed from a benzoquinone-containing rubber composition and preferably have a hardness gradient of 10 Shore C units or greater, which can be used to customize spin, feel, and/or distance characteristics of the golf ball.

Rubber Composition

Rubber compositions of the present invention comprise a base rubber selected from natural and synthetic rubbers, including, but not limited to, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, ethylene propylene rubber (“EPR”), ethylene propylene diene rubber (“EPDM”), styrene-butadiene rubber, styrenic block copolymer rubbers (such as SI, SIS, SB, SBS, SIBS, and the like, where “S” is styrene, “I” is isobutylene, and “B” is butadiene), butyl rubber, halobutyl rubber, polystyrene elastomers, polyethylene elastomers, polyurethane elastomers, polyurea elastomers, metallocene-catalyzed elastomers and plastomers, copolymers of isobutylene and para-alkylstyrene, halogenated copolymers of isobutylene and para-alkylstyrene, copolymers of butadiene with acrylonitrile, polychloroprene, alkyl acrylate rubber, chlorinated isoprene rubber, acrylonitrile chlorinated isoprene rubber, and combinations of two or more thereof. Diene rubbers are preferred, particularly polybutadiene, styrene-butadiene, and mixtures of polybutadiene with other elastomers, and especially 1,4-polybutadiene having a cis-structure of at least 40%. When the base rubber is a mixture of polybutadiene and at least one additional rubber, the amount of polybutadiene in the mixture is preferably at least 40 wt %, based on the total weight of the mixture. Suitable examples of commercially available polybutadienes include, but are not limited to, Buna CB neodymium catalyzed polybutadiene rubbers, such as Buna CB 23, and Taktene® cobalt catalyzed polybutadiene rubbers, such as Taktene® 220 and 221, commercially available from LANXESS® Corporation; SE BR-1220, commercially available from The Dow Chemical Company; Europrene® NEOCIS® BR 40 and BR 60, commercially available from Polimeri Europa®; UBEPOL-BR® rubbers, commercially available from UBE Industries, Ltd.; BR 01 commercially available from Japan Synthetic Rubber Co., Ltd.; and Neodene neodymium catalyzed high cis polybutadiene rubbers, such as Neodene BR 40, commercially available from Karbochem.

Rubber compositions of the present invention include a benzoquinone. Preferred benzoquinones include compounds represented by the following formula, and hydrates thereof:

-   -   wherein each R₁, R₂, R₃, and R₄ is independently selected from         the group consisting of hydrogen, a halogen group (F, Cl, Br,         I), an alkyl group, a carboxyl group (—COOH) and metal salts         thereof (e.g., —COO⁻M⁺) and esters thereof (—COOR), an acetate         group (—CH₂COOH) and esters thereof (—CH₂COOR), a formyl group         (—CHO), an acyl group (—COR), an acetyl group (—COCH₃), a         halogenated carbonyl group (—COX), a sulfo group (—SO₃H) and         esters thereof (—SO₃R), a halogenated sulfonyl group (—SO₂X), a         sulfino group (—SO₂H), an alkylsulfinyl group (—SOR), a         carbamoyl group (—CONH₂), a halogenated alkyl group, a cyano         group (—CN), an alkoxy group (—OR), a hydroxy group (—OH) and         metal salts thereof (e.g., —O⁻M⁺), an amino group (—NH₂), a         nitro group (—NO₂), an aryl group (e.g., phenyl, tolyl, etc.),         an aryloxy group (e.g., phenoxy, etc.), an arylalkyl group         [e.g., cumyl (—C(CH₃)₂phenyl); benzyl (—CH₂ phenyl)], a nitroso         group (—NO), an acetamido group (—NHCOCH₃), and a vinyl group         (—CH═CH₂).

Particularly preferred benzoquinones include compounds represented by the following formula, and hydrates thereof:

-   -   wherein each R₁, R₂, R₃, and R₄ is independently selected from         the group consisting of: a metal salt of a carboxyl group (e.g.,         —COO⁻M⁺), an acetate group (—CH₂COOH) and esters thereof         (—CH₂COOR), a hydroxy group (—OH), a metal salt of a hydroxy         group (e.g., —O⁻M⁺), an amino group (—NH₂), a nitro group         (—NO₂), an aryl group (e.g., phenyl, tolyl, etc.), an aryloxy         group (e.g., phenoxy, etc.), an arylalkyl group [e.g., cumyl         (—C(CH₃)₂phenyl); benzyl (—CH₂ phenyl)], a nitroso group (—NO),         an acetamido group (—NHCOCH₃), and a vinyl group (—CH═CH₂).

Methyl p-benzoquinone and tetrachloro p-benzoquinone are particularly preferred.

Rubber compositions of the present invention may include a combination of two or more benzoquinones, each of which is independently selected from compounds represented by one of the above formulas, or a combination of one or more benzoquinones with one or more chemical compounds selected from the group consisting of hydroquinones, quinhydrones, catechols, and resorcinols.

The present invention is not limited by a particular method for adding the benzoquinone to the rubber composition. The benzoquinone can be added as part of a masterbatch or in the neat form as a liquid or solid.

The benzoquinone is generally present in the rubber composition in an amount of at least 0.05 parts by weight or at least 0.1 parts by weight or at least 0.15 parts by weight or at least 0.2 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, or an amount within the range having a lower limit of 0.05 parts or 0.1 parts or 0.15 parts or 0.25 parts or 0.3 parts or 0.375 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, and an upper limit of 0.5 parts or 0.7 parts or 1 part or 1.5 parts or 2 parts or 3 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber. In a particular embodiment, a ratio (P_(BQ)/P_(FR1)) of the amount (P_(BQ)) of the benzoquinone present in the rubber composition, measured in parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, to the amount (P_(FR1)) of free radical initiator present in the rubber composition, measured in parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, is from 0.05 to 2. In another embodiment, P_(BQ)/P_(FR1) is at least 0.05 and less than 0.5. In another embodiment, P_(BQ)/P_(FR1) is at least 0.2 and less than 0.5. In another embodiment, P_(BQ)/P_(FR1) is at least 0.25 and less than 0.5. In yet another embodiment, P_(BQ)/P_(FR1) is within the range having a lower limit of 0.05 or 0.2 or 0.25 and an upper limit of 0.4 or 0.45 or 0.5 or 2.

Rubber compositions of the present invention preferably comprise a free radical initiator selected from organic peroxides, high energy radiation sources capable of generating free radicals, and combinations thereof. Suitable organic peroxides include, but are not limited to, dicumyl peroxide; n-butyl-4,4-di(t-butylperoxy) valerate; 1,1-di(t-butylperoxy)3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane; 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy) hexane; di-t-butyl peroxide; di-t-amyl peroxide; t-butyl peroxide; t-butyl cumyl peroxide; 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexyne-3; di(2-t-butyl-peroxyisopropyl)benzene; dilauroyl peroxide; dibenzoyl peroxide; t-butyl hydroperoxide; and combinations thereof. In a particular embodiment, the free radical initiator is dicumyl peroxide, including, but not limited to Perkadox® BC, commercially available from Akzo Nobel. Peroxide free radical initiators are generally present in the rubber composition in an amount of at least 0.05 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, or an amount within the range having a lower limit of 0.05 parts or 0.1 parts or 1 part or 1.25 parts or 1.5 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, and an upper limit of 2.5 parts or 3 parts or 5 parts or 6 parts or 10 parts or 15 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber.

Coagents are commonly used with peroxides to increase the state of cure. Suitable coagents include, but are not limited to, metal salts of unsaturated carboxylic acids having from 3 to 8 carbon atoms; unsaturated vinyl compounds and polyfunctional monomers (e.g., trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate); phenylene bismaleimide; and combinations thereof. Particular examples of suitable metal salts include, but are not limited to, one or more metal salts of acrylates, diacrylates, methacrylates, and dimethacrylates, wherein the metal is selected from magnesium, calcium, zinc, aluminum, lithium, and nickel. In a particular embodiment, the coagent is selected from zinc salts of acrylates, diacrylates, methacrylates, and dimethacrylates. In another particular embodiment, the coagent is zinc diacrylate. When the coagent is zinc diacrylate and/or zinc dimethacrylate, the coagent is typically included in the rubber composition in an amount within the range having a lower limit of 1 or 5 or 10 or 15 or 19 or 20 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, and an upper limit of 24 or 25 or 30 or 35 or 40 or 45 or 50 or 60 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber. When one or more less active coagents are used, such as zinc monomethacrylate and various liquid acrylates and methacrylates, the amount of less active coagent used may be the same as or higher than for zinc diacrylate and zinc dimethacrylate coagents. The desired compression may be obtained by adjusting the amount of crosslinking, which can be achieved, for example, by altering the type and amount of coagent.

Curing agents may also be used in rubber compositions of the present invention. Curing agents include, but are not limited to, sulfur; N-oxydiethylene 2-benzothiazole sulfenamide; N,N-di-ortho-tolylguanidine; bismuth dimethyldithiocarbamate; N-cyclohexyl 2-benzothiazole sulfenamide; N,N-diphenylguanidine; 4-morpholinyl-2-benzothiazole disulfide; dipentamethylenethiuram hexasulfide; thiuram disulfides; mercaptobenzothiazoles; sulfenamides; dithiocarbamates; thiuram sulfides; guanidines; thioureas; xanthates; dithiophosphates; aldehyde-amines; dibenzothiazyl disulfide; tetraethylthiuram disulfide; tetrabutylthiuram disulfide; and combinations thereof.

High energy radiation sources capable of generating free radicals include, but are not limited to, electron beams, ultra-violet radiation, gamma radiation, X-ray radiation, infrared radiation, heat, and combinations thereof.

Rubber compositions of the present invention optionally contain one or more antioxidants. When antioxidants are included in the rubber composition, the amount of free radical initiator used may be as high or higher than the amounts disclosed herein. Suitable antioxidants include, for example, dihydroquinoline antioxidants, amine type antioxidants, and phenolic type antioxidants.

Rubber compositions of the present invention optionally contain one or more fillers to adjust the density and/or specific gravity of the core or cover. Exemplary fillers include, but are not limited to, precipitated hydrated silica, clay, talc, asbestos, glass fibers, aramid fibers, mica, calcium metasilicate, barium sulfate, zinc sulfide, lithopone, silicates, silicon carbide, diatomaceous earth, polyvinyl chloride, carbonates (e.g., calcium carbonate, zinc carbonate, barium carbonate, and magnesium carbonate), metals (e.g., titanium, tungsten, aluminum, bismuth, nickel, molybdenum, iron, lead, copper, boron, cobalt, beryllium, zinc, and tin), metal alloys (e.g., steel, brass, bronze, boron carbide whiskers, and tungsten carbide whiskers), metal oxides (e.g., zinc oxide, iron oxide, aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, magnesium oxide, zirconium oxide, and tin oxide), particulate carbonaceous materials (e.g., graphite, carbon black, cotton flock, natural bitumen, cellulose flock, and leather fiber), microballoons (e.g., glass and ceramic), fly ash, regrind, nanofillers and combinations thereof. The amount of particulate material(s) present in rubber compositions of the present invention is typically within the range having a lower limit of 5 parts or 10 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, and an upper limit of 30 parts or 50 parts or 100 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber.

Rubber compositions of the present invention optionally contain one or more additives selected from processing aids, processing oils, plasticizers, coloring agents, fluorescent agents, chemical blowing and foaming agents, defoaming agents, stabilizers, softening agents, impact modifiers, and the like. The amount of additive(s) typically present in rubber compositions of the present invention is typically within the range having a lower limit of 0 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber and an upper limit of 20 parts or 50 parts or 100 parts or 150 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the rubber composition contains a conventional soft and fast agent. The conventional soft and fast agent is optionally used in an amount within a range having a lower limit of 0.1 or 0.2 or 0.5 phr and an upper limit of 2 or 3 or 5 phr. As used herein, “soft and fast agent” means any compound or a blend thereof that is capable of making a core 1) softer (have a lower compression) at a constant COR and/or 2) faster (have a higher COR at equal compression), when compared to a core equivalently prepared without a soft and fast agent. Suitable conventional soft and fast agents include, but are not limited to, those selected from organosulfur and metal-containing organosulfur compounds, organic sulfur compounds, including mono, di, and polysulfides, thiol, and mercapto compounds, inorganic sulfide compounds, Group VIA compounds, substituted or unsubstituted aromatic organic compounds that do not contain sulfur or metal, aromatic organometallic compounds, and mixtures thereof. Particularly suitable soft and fast agents include, but are not limited to, zinc pentachlorothiophenol, pentachlorothiophenol, ditolyl disulfide, diphenyl disulfide, dixylyl disulfide, and mixtures thereof. The soft and fast agent component may also be a blend of an organosulfur compound and an inorganic sulfide compound. Suitable organosulfur compounds are further disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,635,716, 6,919,393, 7,005,479 and 7,148,279, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

In another embodiment, the rubber composition is substantially free of organosulfur compounds. “Substantially free,” as used herein, means that the rubber composition does not contain an organosulfur compound, or includes one or more organosulfur compounds in an amount of less than 0.01 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber.

Suitable types and amounts of rubber, initiator, coagent, curing agent, antioxidant, filler, and additive are more fully disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,566,483, 6,695,718, 6,939,907, 7,041,721 and 7,138,460, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

A non-limiting example of a preferred rubber formulation is shown in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 SE BR-1220 * 100 (parts by weight) zinc diacrylate 40 (parts by weight) Perkadox ® BC ** 2 (parts by weight) zinc oxide 5 (parts by weight) zinc pentachlorothiophenol 0.5 (parts by weight) benzoquinone 0.7 (parts by weight) filler *** (parts by weight) * SE BR-1220 is a high cis-1,4 polybutadiene commercially available from The Dow Chemical Company. ** Perkadox ® BC is a peroxide free radical initiators commercially available from Akzo Nobel. *** The amount of filler used can be adjusted to hit target specific gravity.

Golf Ball Applications

A golf ball having a solid, single-layer core and a cover enclosing the core is disclosed. The core is formed from a benzoquinone-containing rubber composition, as disclosed above, and generally has a diameter within a range having a lower limit of 1.00 or 1.25 or 1.40 or 1.45 or 1.50 or 1.51 or 1.52 or 1.53 inches and an upper limit of 1.54 or 1.55 or 1.56 or 1.57 or 1.58 or 1.59 or 1.60 or 1.62 or 1.63 or 1.66 inches. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the core has a diameter of about 1.53 inches.

The core preferably has a center hardness of 70 Shore C or less, or 65 Shore C or less, or a center hardness within a range having a lower limit of 30 or 40 or 45 or 50 Shore C and an upper limit of 55 or 60 or 65 or 70 or 75 or 80 Shore C.

The surface hardness of the core is preferably 80 Shore C or greater, or greater than 80 Shore C, or 85 Shore C or greater, or greater than 85 Shore C, or 87 Shore C or greater, or 90 Shore C or greater, or within a range having a lower limit of 80 or 85 or 90 Shore C and an upper limit of 95 Shore C or 100 Shore C or 60 Shore D or 65 Shore D or 70 Shore D.

The center hardness of a core is obtained according to the following procedure. The core is gently pressed into a hemispherical holder having an internal diameter approximately slightly smaller than the diameter of the core, such that the core is held in place in the hemispherical portion of the holder while concurrently leaving the geometric central plane of the core exposed. The core is secured in the holder by friction, such that it will not move during the cutting and grinding steps, but the friction is not so excessive that distortion of the natural shape of the core would result. The core is secured such that the parting line of the core is roughly parallel to the top of the holder. The diameter of the core is measured 90 degrees to this orientation prior to securing. A measurement is also made from the bottom of the holder to the top of the core to provide a reference point for future calculations. A rough cut, made slightly above the exposed geometric center of the core using a band saw or other appropriate cutting tool, making sure that the core does not move in the holder during this step. The remainder of the core, still in the holder, is secured to the base plate of a surface grinding machine. The exposed ‘rough’ surface is ground to a smooth, flat surface, revealing the geometric center of the core, which can be verified by measuring the height of the bottom of the holder to the exposed surface of the core, making sure that exactly half of the original height of the core, as measured above, has been removed to within ±0.004 inches. Leaving the core in the holder, the center of the core is found with a center square and carefully marked and the hardness is measured at the center mark.

The surface hardness of a golf ball layer is obtained from the average of a number of measurements taken from opposing hemispheres, taking care to avoid making measurements on the parting line of the core or on surface defects, such as holes or protrusions. Hardness measurements are made pursuant to ASTM D-2240 “Indentation Hardness of Rubber and Plastic by Means of a Durometer.” Because of the curved surface, care must be taken to insure that the golf ball or golf ball subassembly is centered under the durometer indentor before a surface hardness reading is obtained. A calibrated, digital durometer, capable of reading to 0.1 hardness units is used for all hardness measurements and is set to take hardness readings at 1 second after the maximum reading is obtained. The digital durometer must be attached to, and its foot made parallel to, the base of an automatic stand. The weight on the durometer and attack rate conform to ASTM D-2240.

In a particular embodiment, the surface hardness of the core is greater than or equal to the center hardness of the core. In another particular embodiment, the core has a positive hardness gradient wherein the difference between the surface hardness of the core (H_(SURFACE)) and the center hardness of the core (H_(CENTER)) is 10 Shore C units or greater, or 15 Shore C units or greater, or 20 Shore C units or greater, or 25 Shore C units or greater, or 30 Shore C units or greater, or 35 Shore C units or greater, or 40 Shore C units or greater, or 45 Shore C units or greater. In another particular embodiment, the core has a positive hardness gradient wherein the difference between the surface hardness of the core (H_(SURFACE)) and the center hardness of the core (H_(CENTER)) is within a range having a lower limit of 20 or 25 or 30 or 35 or 40 Shore C units and an upper limit of 45 or 50 or 55 Shore C units.

A hardness gradient of a core is defined by hardness measurements made at the surface and center of the core. For purposes of the present invention, “negative” and “positive” refer to the result of subtracting the hardness value at the innermost portion of the golf ball component from the hardness value at the outer surface of the component. For example, if the outer surface of a solid core has a lower hardness value than the center (i.e., the surface is softer than the center), the hardness gradient will be deemed a “negative” gradient. In measuring the hardness gradient of a core, the center hardness is first determined according to the procedure above for obtaining the center hardness of a core. Once the center of the core is marked and the hardness thereof is determined, hardness measurements at any distance from the center of the core may be measured by drawing a line radially outward from the center mark, and measuring and marking the distance from the center, typically in 2 mm increments. All hardness measurements performed on a plane passing through the geometric center are performed while the core is still in the holder and without having disturbed its orientation, such that the test surface is constantly parallel to the bottom of the holder. The hardness difference from any predetermined location on the core is calculated as the average surface hardness minus the hardness at the appropriate reference point, e.g., at the center of the core for a single, solid core, such that a core surface softer than its center will have a negative hardness gradient. Hardness gradients are disclosed more fully, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/832,163, filed on Aug. 1, 2007; 11/939,632, filed on Nov. 14, 2007; 11/939,634, filed on Nov. 14, 2007; 11/939,635, filed on Nov. 14, 2007; and 11/939,637, filed on Nov. 14, 2007; the entire disclosure of each of these references is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

The weight distribution of cores disclosed herein can be varied to achieve certain desired parameters, such as spin rate, compression, and initial velocity.

Golf ball cores of the present invention preferably have a compression of 110 or less, or 90 or less, or 80 or less, or 75 or less, or 70 or less, or 65 or less, or 60 or less, or 50 or less, or a compression of from 50 to 90, or from 60 to 85, or from 60 to 80, or from 65 to 80, or an overall compression of about 70.

Compression is an important factor in golf ball design. For example, the compression of the core can affect the ball's spin rate off the driver and the feel. As disclosed in Jeff Dalton's Compression by Any Other Name, Science and Golf IV, Proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf (Eric Thain ed., Routledge, 2002) (“J. Dalton”), several different methods can be used to measure compression, including Atti compression, Riehle compression, load/deflection measurements at a variety of fixed loads and offsets, and effective modulus. For purposes of the present invention, “compression” refers to Atti compression and is measured according to a known procedure, using an Atti compression test device, wherein a piston is used to compress a ball against a spring. The travel of the piston is fixed and the deflection of the spring is measured. The measurement of the deflection of the spring does not begin with its contact with the ball; rather, there is an offset of approximately the first 1.25 mm (0.05 inches) of the spring's deflection. Very low stiffness cores will not cause the spring to deflect by more than 1.25 mm and therefore have a zero compression measurement. The Atti compression tester is designed to measure objects having a diameter of 1.680 inches; thus, smaller objects, such as golf ball cores, must be shimmed to a total height of 1.680 inches to obtain an accurate reading. Conversion from Atti compression to Riehle (cores), Riehle (balls), 100 kg deflection, 130-10 kg deflection or effective modulus can be carried out according to the formulas given in J. Dalton.

Golf ball cores of the present invention typically have a coefficient of restitution (“COR”) at 125 ft/s of at least 0.750, or at least 0.775 or at least 0.780, or at least 0.782, or at least 0.785, or at least 0.787, or at least 0.790, or at least 0.795, or at least 0.798, or at least 0.800.

COR, as used herein, is determined according to a known procedure wherein a golf ball or golf ball subassembly (e.g., a golf ball core) is fired from an air cannon at two given velocities and calculated at a velocity of 125 ft/s. Ballistic light screens are located between the air cannon and the steel plate at a fixed distance to measure ball velocity. As the ball travels toward the steel plate, it activates each light screen, and the time at each light screen is measured. This provides an incoming transit time period inversely proportional to the ball's incoming velocity. The ball impacts the steel plate and rebounds though the light screens, which again measure the time period required to transit between the light screens. This provides an outgoing transit time period inversely proportional to the ball's outgoing velocity. COR is then calculated as the ratio of the outgoing transit time period to the incoming transit time period, COR=V_(out)/V_(in)=T_(in)/T_(out).

Cores of the present invention are enclosed with a cover, which may be a single-, dual-, or multi-layer cover, preferably having an overall thickness within the range having a lower limit of 0.01 inches or 0.02 inches or 0.025 inches or 0.03 inches or 0.04 inches or 0.045 inches or 0.05 inches or 0.06 inches and an upper limit of 0.07 inches or 0.075 inches or 0.08 inches or 0.09 inches or 0.1 inches or 0.15 inches or 0.2 inches or 0.3 inches or 0.5 inches. Dual and multilayer covers have an inner cover layer and an outer cover layer, and multilayer covers additionally have at least one intermediate cover layer disposed between the inner cover layer and the outer cover layer. Inner cover layers of the present invention preferably have a thickness within the range having a lower limit of 0.01 inches or 0.02 inches or 0.025 inches and an upper limit of 0.05 inches or 0.15 inches or 0.2 inches. Outer cover layers of the present invention preferably have a thickness of 0.01 inches or 0.02 inches or 0.025 inches and an upper limit of 0.05 inches or 0.15 inches or 0.2 inches. Intermediate cover layer(s) of the present invention preferably have a thickness of 0.01 inches or 0.02 inches or 0.025 inches and an upper limit of 0.05 inches or 0.15 inches or 0.2 inches.

The cover material is preferably a tough, cut-resistant material, selected based on the desired performance characteristics. Suitable cover materials for the golf balls disclosed herein include, but are not limited to, ionomer resins and blends thereof (e.g., Surlyn® ionomer resins and DuPont® HPF 1000 and HPF 2000, commercially available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company; Iotek® ionomers, commercially available from ExxonMobil Chemical Company; Amplify® IO ionomers of ethylene acrylic acid copolymers, commercially available from The Dow Chemical Company; and Clarix® ionomer resins, commercially available from A. Schulman Inc.); polyurethanes; polyureas; copolymers and hybrids of polyurethane and polyurea; polyethylene, including, for example, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, and high density polyethylene; polypropylene; rubber-toughened olefin polymers; acid copolymers, e.g., (meth)acrylic acid, which do not become part of an ionomeric copolymer; plastomers; flexomers; styrene/butadiene/styrene block copolymers; styrene/ethylene-butylene/styrene block copolymers; dynamically vulcanized elastomers; ethylene vinyl acetates; ethylene methyl acrylates; polyvinyl chloride resins; polyamides, amide-ester elastomers, and graft copolymers of ionomer and polyamide, including, for example, Pebax® thermoplastic polyether block amides, commercially available from Arkema Inc; crosslinked trans-polyisoprene and blends thereof; polyester-based thermoplastic elastomers, such as Hytrel®, commercially available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company; polyurethane-based thermoplastic elastomers, such as Elastollan®, commercially available from BASF; synthetic or natural vulcanized rubber; and combinations thereof. Suitable cover materials and constructions also include, but are not limited to, those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,117,025, 6,767,940, and 6,960,630, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Compositions comprising an ionomer or a blend of two or more ionomers are particularly suitable for forming the inner cover layer in dual-layer covers. Preferred ionomeric compositions include:

-   -   (a) a composition comprising a “high acid ionomer” (i.e., having         an acid content of greater than 16 wt %), such as Surlyn 8150®;     -   (b) a composition comprising a high acid ionomer and a maleic         anhydride-grafted non-ionomeric polymer (e.g., Fusabond® maleic         anhydride-grafted metallocene-catalyzed ethylene-butene         copolymers). A particularly preferred blend of high acid ionomer         and maleic anhydride-grafted polymer is a 84 wt %/16 wt % blend         of Surlyn 8150® and Fusabond®. Blends of high acid ionomers with         maleic anhydride-grafted polymers are further disclosed, for         example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,992,135 and 6,677,401, the entire         disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by         reference;     -   (c) a composition comprising a 50/45/5 blend of Surlyn®         8940/Surlyn® 9650/Nucrel® 960, preferably having a material         hardness of from 80 to 85 Shore C;     -   (d) a composition comprising a 50/25/25 blend of Surlyn®         8940/Surlyn® 9650/Surlyn® 9910, preferably having a material         hardness of about 90 Shore C;     -   (e) a composition comprising a 50/50 blend of Surlyn®         8940/Surlyn® 9650, preferably having a material hardness of         about 86 Shore C;     -   (f) a composition comprising a blend of Surlyn® 7940/Surlyn®         8940, optionally including a melt flow modifier;     -   (g) a composition comprising a blend of a first high acid         ionomer and a second high acid ionomer, wherein the first high         acid ionomer is neutralized with a different cation than the         second high acid ionomer (e.g., 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 8150 and         Surlyn® 9150), optionally including one or more melt flow         modifiers such as an ionomer, ethylene-acid copolymer or ester         terpolymer; and     -   (h) a composition comprising a blend of a first high acid         ionomer and a second high acid ionomer, wherein the first high         acid ionomer is neutralized with a different cation than the         second high acid ionomer, and from 0 to 10 wt % of an         ethylene/acid/ester ionomer wherein the ethylene/acid/ester         ionomer is neutralized with the same cation as either the first         high acid ionomer or the second high acid ionomer or a different         cation than the first and second high acid ionomers (e.g., a         blend of 40-50 wt % Surlyn® 8140, 40-50 wt % Surlyn® 9120, and         0-10 wt % Surlyn® 6320).

Surlyn 8150®, Surlyn® 8940, and Surlyn® 8140 are different grades of E/MAA copolymer in which the acid groups have been partially neutralized with sodium ions. Surlyn® 9650, Surlyn® 9910, Surlyn® 9150, and Surlyn® 9120 are different grades of E/MAA copolymer in which the acid groups have been partially neutralized with zinc ions. Surlyn® 7940 is an E/MAA copolymer in which the acid groups have been partially neutralized with lithium ions. Surlyn® 6320 is a very low modulus magnesium ionomer with a medium acid content. Nucrel® 960 is an E/MAA copolymer resin nominally made with 15 wt % methacrylic acid. Surlyn® ionomers, Fusabond® copolymers, and Nucrel® copolymers are commercially available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.

Non-limiting examples of particularly preferred ionomeric cover layer formulations are shown in Table 2 below.

TABLE 2 Cover Layer Surlyn ® 8150, Fusabond ®, Shore C Hardness Material wt % wt % at 10 Days 1 89 11 91.2 2 84 16 89.8 3 84 16 90.4 4 84 16 89.6 5 81 19 88.9 6 80 20 89.1 7 78 22 88.1 8 76 24 87.6 9 76 24 87.2 10 73 27 86.6 11 71 29 86.7 12 67 33 84.0

Ionomeric cover compositions can be blended with non-ionic thermoplastic resins, particularly to manipulate product properties. Examples of suitable non-ionic thermoplastic resins include, but are not limited to, polyurethane, poly-ether-ester, poly-amide-ether, polyether-urea, thermoplastic polyether block amides (e.g., Pebax® block copolymers, commercially available from Arkema Inc.), styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymers, styrene(ethylene-butylene)-styrene block copolymers, polyamides, polyesters, polyolefins (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, polyethylene-(meth)acrylate, polyethylene-(meth)acrylic acid, functionalized polymers with maleic anhydride grafting, Fusabond® functionalized olefins commercially available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, functionalized polymers with epoxidation, elastomers (e.g., ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber, metallocene-catalyzed polyolefin) and ground powders of thermoset elastomers.

Suitable ionomeric cover materials are further disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,653,382, 6,756,436, 6,894,098, 6,919,393, and 6,953,820, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

Polyurethanes, polyureas, and blends and hybrids of polyurethane/polyurea are particularly suitable for forming the outer cover layer in dual-layer covers. When used as cover layer materials, polyurethanes and polyureas can be thermoset or thermoplastic. Thermoset materials can be formed into golf ball layers by conventional casting or reaction injection molding techniques. Thermoplastic materials can be formed into golf ball layers by conventional compression or injection molding techniques. In embodiments of the present invention wherein a golf ball having a single layer cover is provided, the cover layer material is preferably selected from polyurethane and polyurea. In embodiments of the present invention wherein a golf ball having a dual cover is provided, the inner cover layer is preferably a high modulus thermoplastic, and the outer cover layer is preferably selected from polyurethane and polyurea.

Suitable polyurethane cover materials are further disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,334,673, 6,506,851, 6,756,436, and 7,105,623, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. Suitable polyurea cover materials are further disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,484,870 and 6,835,794, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. Suitable polyurethane-urea cover materials include polyurethane/polyurea blends and copolymers comprising urethane and urea segments, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0117923, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Golf ball cover compositions may include a flow modifier, such as, but not limited to, Nucrel® acid copolymer resins, and particularly Nucrel® 960. Nucrel® acid copolymer resins are commercially available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.

Cover compositions may also include one or more filler(s), such as the fillers given above for rubber compositions of the present invention (e.g., titanium dioxide, barium sulfate, etc.), and/or additive(s), such as coloring agents, fluorescent agents, whitening agents, antioxidants, dispersants, UV absorbers, light stabilizers, plasticizers, surfactants, compatibility agents, foaming agents, reinforcing agents, release agents, and the like.

Additional suitable cover materials are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0164810, U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,100, and PCT Publications WO00/23519 and WO00/29129, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

In a particular embodiment, the cover is a single layer preferably formed from an ionomeric composition. The single layer cover preferably has a surface hardness of 65 Shore D or less, or 60 Shore D or less, or 45 Shore D or less, or 40 Shore D or less, or from 25 Shore D to 40 Shore D, or from 30 Shore D to 40 Shore D and a thickness within a range having a lower limit of 0.010 or 0.015 or 0.020 or 0.025 or 0.030 or 0.055 or 0.060 inches and an upper limit of 0.065 or 0.080 or 0.090 or 0.100 or 0.110 or 0.120 or 0.140 inches.

In another particular embodiment, the cover is a two-layer cover consisting of an inner cover layer and an outer cover layer. In a particular aspect of this embodiment, the surface hardness of the core is greater than the material hardness of the inner cover layer. In another particular aspect of this embodiment, the surface hardness of the core is greater than the material hardness of both the inner cover layer and the outer cover layer.

The inner cover layer is preferably formed from an ionomeric composition and preferably has a surface hardness of 60 Shore D or greater, or 65 Shore D or greater, or a surface hardness within a range having a lower limit of 30 or 40 or 55 or 60 or 65 Shore D and an upper limit of 66 or 68 or 70 or 75 Shore D, and a thickness within a range having a lower limit of 0.010 or 0.015 or 0.020 or 0.030 inches and an upper limit of 0.035 or 0.040 or 0.045 or 0.050 or 0.055 or 0.075 or 0.080 or 0.100 or 0.110 or 0.120 inches. The inner cover layer composition preferably has a material hardness of 95 Shore C or less, or less than 95 Shore C, or 92 Shore C or less, or 90 Shore C or less, or 85 Shore C or less, or has a material hardness within a range having a lower limit of 70 or 75 or 80 or 82 or 84 Shore C and an upper limit of 85 or 86 or 90 or 92 or 95 Shore C. The outer cover layer is preferably formed from a castable or reaction injection moldable polyurethane, polyurea, or copolymer or hybrid of polyurethane/polyurea. Such cover material is preferably thermosetting, but may be thermoplastic. The outer cover layer composition preferably has a material hardness of 85 Shore C or less, or 45 Shore D or less, or 40 Shore D or less, or from 25 Shore D to 40 Shore D, or from 30 Shore D to 40 Shore D. The outer cover layer preferably has a surface hardness within a range having a lower limit of 20 or 30 or 35 or 40 Shore D and an upper limit of 52 or 58 or 60 or 65 or 70 or 72 or 75 Shore D. The outer cover layer preferably has a thickness within a range having a lower limit of 0.010 or 0.015 or 0.025 inches and an upper limit of 0.035 or 0.040 or 0.045 or 0.050 or 0.055 or 0.075 or 0.080 or 0.115 inches. The two-layer cover preferably has an overall thickness within a range having a lower limit of 0.010 or 0.015 or 0.020 or 0.025 or 0.030 or 0.055 or 0.060 inches and an upper limit of 0.065 or 0.075 or 0.080 or 0.090 or 0.100 or 0.110 or 0.120 or 0.140 inches.

For purposes of the present disclosure, material hardness is measured according to ASTM D2240 and generally involves measuring the hardness of a flat “slab” or “button” formed of the material. It should be understood that there is a fundamental difference between “material hardness” and “hardness as measured directly on a golf ball.” Hardness as measured directly on a golf ball (or other spherical surface) typically results in a different hardness value than material hardness. This difference in hardness values is due to several factors including, but not limited to, ball construction (i.e., core type, number of core and/or cover layers, etc.), ball (or sphere) diameter, and the material composition of adjacent layers. It should also be understood that the two measurement techniques are not linearly related and, therefore, one hardness value cannot easily be correlated to the other. Unless stated otherwise, the hardness values given herein for cover materials are material hardness values measured according to ASTM D2240, with all values reported following 10 days of aging at 50% relative humidity and 23° C.

Golf balls of the present invention optionally include one or more intermediate layer(s) disposed between the core and the cover. When present, the overall thickness of the intermediate layer(s) is generally within the range having a lower limit of 0.01 inches or 0.05 inches or 0.1 inches and an upper limit of 0.3 inches or 0.35 inches or 0.4 inches. Suitable intermediate layer materials include, but are not limited to, natural rubbers, balata, gutta-percha, cis-polybutadienes, trans-polybutadienes, synthetic polyisoprenes, polyoctenamers, styrene-propylene-diene rubbers, metallocene rubbers, styrene-butadiene rubbers, ethylene-propylenes, chloroprene rubbers, acrylonitrile rubbers, acrylonitrile-butadiene rubbers, styrene-ethylene block copolymers, maleic anhydride or succinate modified metallocene catalyzed ethylene copolymers, polypropylene resins, ionomer resins, polyamides, polyesters, polyurethanes, polyureas, chlorinated polyethylenes, polysulfide rubbers, fluorocarbons, and combinations thereof.

A moisture vapor barrier layer is optionally employed between the core and the cover. Moisture vapor barrier layers are further disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,632,147, 6,932,720, 7,004,854, and 7,182,702, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Golf balls of the present invention preferably have an overall diameter within the range having a lower limit of 1.60 or 1.62 or 1.66 inches and an upper limit of 1.69 or 1.74 or 1.80 inches. More preferably, golf balls of the present invention have an overall diameter of 1.68 inches. Golf balls of the present invention typically have a compression within a range having a lower limit of 40 or 50 or 60 and an upper limit of 100 or 105 or 110 or 120. Golf balls of the present invention preferably have a COR at 125 ft/s of 0.700 or greater, or 0.750 or greater, or 0.780 or greater, or 0.790 or greater.

Golf balls of the present invention will typically have dimple coverage of 60% or greater, preferably 65% or greater, and more preferably 75% or greater.

The United States Golf Association specifications limit the minimum size of a competition golf ball to 1.680 inches. There is no specification as to the maximum diameter, and golf balls of any size can be used for recreational play. Golf balls of the present invention can have an overall diameter of any size. The preferred diameter of the present golf balls is from 1.680 inches to 1.800 inches. More preferably, the present golf balls have an overall diameter of from 1.680 inches to 1.760 inches, and even more preferably from 1.680 inches to 1.740 inches.

Golf balls of the present invention preferably have a moment of inertia (“MOI”) of 70-95 g·cm², preferably 75-93 g·cm², and more preferably 76-90 g·cm². For low MOI embodiments, the golf ball preferably has an MOI of 85 g·cm² or less, or 83 g·cm² or less. For high MOI embodiment, the golf ball preferably has an MOI of 86 g·cm² or greater, or 87 g·cm² or greater. MOI is measured on a model MOI-005-104 Moment of Inertia Instrument manufactured by Inertia Dynamics of Collinsville, Conn. The instrument is connected to a PC for communication via a COMM port and is driven by MOI Instrument Software version #1.2.

Suitable golf ball constructions and materials are further disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2003/0144087 and 2005/0164810, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,688,119 and 5,919,100, and PCT Publications WO00/23519 and WO00/29129. The entire disclosure of each of these references is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

The present invention is not limited by any particular process for forming the golf ball layer(s). It should be understood that the layer(s) can be formed by any suitable technique, including injection molding, compression molding, casting, and reaction injection molding.

When injection molding is used, the composition is typically in a pelletized or granulated form that can be easily fed into the throat of an injection molding machine wherein it is melted and conveyed via a screw in a heated barrel at temperatures of from 150° F. to 600° F., preferably from 200° F. to 500° F. The molten composition is ultimately injected into a closed mold cavity, which may be cooled, at ambient or at an elevated temperature, but typically the mold is cooled to a temperature of from 50° F. to 70° F. After residing in the closed mold for a time of from 1 second to 300 seconds, preferably from 20 seconds to 120 seconds, the core and/or core plus one or more additional core or cover layers is removed from the mold and either allowed to cool at ambient or reduced temperatures or is placed in a cooling fluid such as water, ice water, dry ice in a solvent, or the like.

When compression molding is used to form a core, the composition is first formed into a preform or slug of material, typically in a cylindrical or roughly spherical shape at a weight slightly greater than the desired weight of the molded core. Prior to this step, the composition may be first extruded or otherwise melted and forced through a die after which it is cut into a cylindrical preform. It is that preform that is then placed into a compression mold cavity and compressed at a mold temperature of from 150° F. to 400° F., preferably from 250° F. to 400° F., and more preferably from 300° F. to 400° F. When compression molding a cover layer, half-shells of the cover layer material are first formed via injection molding. A core is then enclosed within two half shells, which is then placed into a compression mold cavity and compressed.

Reaction injection molding processes are further disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,083,119, 7,338,391, 7,282,169, 7,281,997 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006/0247073, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

In addition to the materials disclosed above, any of the core or cover layers may comprise one or more of the following materials: thermoplastic elastomer, thermoset elastomer, synthetic rubber, thermoplastic vulcanizate, copolymeric ionomer, terpolymeric ionomer, polycarbonate, polyolefin, polyamide, copolymeric polyamide, polyesters, polyester-amides, polyether-amides, polyvinyl alcohols, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers, polyarylate, polyacrylate, polyphenylene ether, impact-modified polyphenylene ether, high impact polystyrene, diallyl phthalate polymer, metallocene-catalyzed polymers, styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN), olefin-modified SAN, acrylonitrile-styrene-acrylonitrile, styrene-maleic anhydride (S/MA) polymer, styrenic copolymer, functionalized styrenic copolymer, functionalized styrenic terpolymer, styrenic terpolymer, cellulose polymer, liquid crystal polymer (LCP), ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), ethylene propylene rubber (EPR), ethylene vinyl acetate, polyurea, and polysiloxane. Suitable polyamides for use as an additional material in compositions disclosed herein also include resins obtained by: (1) polycondensation of (a) a dicarboxylic acid, such as oxalic acid, adipic acid, sebacic acid, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid or 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, with (b) a diamine, such as ethylenediamine, tetramethylenediamine, pentamethylenediamine, hexamethylenediamine, or decamethylenediamine, 1,4-cyclohexyldiamine or m-xylylenediamine; (2) a ring-opening polymerization of cyclic lactam, such as ε-caprolactam or ω-laurolactam; (3) polycondensation of an aminocarboxylic acid, such as 6-aminocaproic acid, 9-aminononanoic acid, 11-aminoundecanoic acid or 12-aminododecanoic acid; or (4) copolymerzation of a cyclic lactam with a dicarboxylic acid and a diamine. Specific examples of suitable polyamides include Nylon 6, Nylon 66, Nylon 610, Nylon 11, Nylon 12, copolymerized Nylon, Nylon MXD6, and Nylon 46.

Other preferred materials suitable for use as an additional material in golf ball compositions disclosed herein include Skypel polyester elastomers, commercially available from SK Chemicals of South Korea; Septon® diblock and triblock copolymers, commercially available from Kuraray Corporation of Kurashiki, Japan; and Kraton® diblock and triblock copolymers, commercially available from Kraton Polymers LLC of Houston, Tex.

Ionomers are also well suited for blending with compositions disclosed herein. Suitable ionomeric polymers include α-olefin/unsaturated carboxylic acid copolymer- or terpolymer-type ionomeric resins. Copolymeric ionomers are obtained by neutralizing at least a portion of the carboxylic groups in a copolymer of an α-olefin and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having from 3 to 8 carbon atoms, with a metal ion. Terpolymeric ionomers are obtained by neutralizing at least a portion of the carboxylic groups in a terpolymer of an α-olefin, an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid having from 3 to 8 carbon atoms, and an α,β-unsaturated carboxylate having from 2 to 22 carbon atoms, with a metal ion. Examples of suitable α-olefins for copolymeric and terpolymeric ionomers include ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, and 1-hexene. Examples of suitable unsaturated carboxylic acids for copolymeric and terpolymeric ionomers include acrylic, methacrylic, ethacrylic, α-chloroacrylic, crotonic, maleic, fumaric, and itaconic acid. Copolymeric and terpolymeric ionomers include ionomers having varied acid contents and degrees of acid neutralization, neutralized by monovalent or bivalent cations as disclosed herein. Examples of commercially available ionomers suitable for blending with compositions disclosed herein include Surlyn® ionomer resins, commercially available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, and Iotek® ionomers, commercially available from ExxonMobil Chemical Company.

Silicone materials are also well suited for blending with compositions disclosed herein. Suitable silicone materials include monomers, oligomers, prepolymers, and polymers, with or without adding reinforcing filler. One type of silicone material that is suitable can incorporate at least 1 alkenyl group having at least 2 carbon atoms in their molecules. Examples of these alkenyl groups include, but are not limited to, vinyl, allyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl, and decenyl. The alkenyl functionality can be located at any location of the silicone structure, including one or both terminals of the structure. The remaining (i.e., non-alkenyl) silicon-bonded organic groups in this component are independently selected from hydrocarbon or halogenated hydrocarbon groups that contain no aliphatic unsaturation. Non-limiting examples of these include: alkyl groups, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, and hexyl; cycloalkyl groups, such as cyclohexyl and cycloheptyl; aryl groups, such as phenyl, tolyl, and xylyl; aralkyl groups, such as benzyl and phenethyl; and halogenated alkyl groups, such as 3,3,3-trifluoropropyl and chloromethyl. Another type of suitable silicone material is one having hydrocarbon groups that lack aliphatic unsaturation. Specific examples include: trimethylsiloxy-endblocked dimethylsiloxane-methylhexenylsiloxane copolymers; dimethylhexenylsiloxy-endblocked dimethylsiloxane-methylhexenylsiloxane copolymers; trimethylsiloxy-endblocked dimethylsiloxane-methylvinylsiloxane copolymers; trimethylsiloxyl-endblocked methylphenylsiloxane-dimethylsiloxane-methylvinysiloxane copolymers; dimethylvinylsiloxy-endblocked dimethylpolysiloxanes; dimethylvinylsiloxy-endblocked dimethylsiloxane-methylvinylsiloxane copolymers; dimethylvinylsiloxy-endblocked methylphenylpolysiloxanes; dimethylvinylsiloxy-endblocked methylphenylsiloxane-dimethylsiloxane-methylvinylsiloxane copolymers; and the copolymers listed above wherein at least one group is dimethylhydroxysiloxy. Examples of commercially available silicones suitable for blending with compositions disclosed herein include Silastic® silicone rubber, commercially available from Dow Corning Corporation of Midland, Mich.; Blensil® silicone rubber, commercially available from General Electric Company of Waterford, New York; and Elastosil® silicones, commercially available from Wacker Chemie AG of Germany.

Other types of copolymers can also be added to the golf ball compositions disclosed herein. For example, suitable copolymers comprising epoxy monomers include styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymers in which the polybutadiene block contains an epoxy group, and styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymers in which the polyisoprene block contains epoxy. Examples of commercially available epoxy functionalized copolymers include ESBS A1005, ESBS A1010, ESBS A1020, ESBS AT018, and ESBS AT019 epoxidized styrene-butadiene-styrene block copolymers, commercially available from Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd. of Japan.

Compositions disclosed herein can be either foamed or filled with density adjusting materials to provide desirable golf ball performance characteristics.

PROPHETIC EXAMPLE

It should be understood that the examples below are for illustrative purposes only. In no manner is the present invention limited to the specific disclosures herein.

In the following example, two comparative compositions (C1 and C2) and a composition of the present invention (Example 1) are prepared by mixing the components in a Brabender mixer for 5-10 minutes. The type and relative amount of each component to be used is indicated in Table 3.

The resulting rubber compositions are then cured in a compression molding press at 350° F. for 11 minutes to obtain spheres, which are subsequently ground to a diameter of 1.530 inches.

Each of the resulting spheres is evaluated for hardness at the center and at various distances from the center. Expected results for hardness are reported in Table 3.

TABLE 3 C1 C2 Example 1 Composition SE BR-1220¹ 100 100 100 (parts by weight) SR526² 29 30 40 (parts by weight) Perkadox ® BC³ 0 1 2 (parts by weight) Trigonox ® 265³ 0.53 0 0 (parts by weight) zinc oxide 5 5 5 (parts by weight) zinc pentachlorothiophenol 0 0.5 0.5 (parts by weight) benzoquinone 0 0 0.7 (parts by weight) filler * * * Hardness surface hardness (Shore C) 76 84 88 center hardness (Shore C) 65 63 58 hardness gradient 11 21 30 ¹SE BR-1220 is a high cis-1,4 polybutadiene commercially available from The Dow Chemical Company. ²SR526 is a zinc diacrylate coagent commercially available from Sartomer Industries, Inc. ³Perkadox ® BC and Trigonox ® 265 are peroxide free radical initiators commercially available from Akzo Nobel. * The amount of filler used can be adjusted to hit target specific gravity.

When numerical lower limits and numerical upper limits are set forth herein, it is contemplated that any combination of these values may be used.

All patents, publications, test procedures, and other references cited herein, including priority documents, are fully incorporated by reference to the extent such disclosure is not inconsistent with this invention and for all jurisdictions in which such incorporation is permitted.

While the illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described with particularity, it will be understood that various other modifications will be apparent to and can be readily made by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the claims appended hereto be limited to the examples and descriptions set forth herein, but rather that the claims be construed as encompassing all of the features of patentable novelty which reside in the present invention, including all features which would be treated as equivalents thereof by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. 

1. A golf ball consisting of: a solid, single-layer core formed from a rubber composition comprising a base rubber and a benzoquinone; and a cover; wherein the core has a center Shore C hardness (H_(CENTER)) and a surface Shore C hardness (H_(SURFACE)), and H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧25 Shore C units.
 2. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧30 Shore C units.
 3. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧35 Shore C units.
 4. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧40 Shore C units.
 5. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧45 Shore C units.
 6. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the benzoquinone is present in the rubber composition in an amount of at least 0.15 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber.
 7. The golf ball of claim 6, wherein the rubber composition additionally comprises at least 0.05 parts by weight of a free radical initiator per 100 parts of the base rubber, and wherein a ratio (P_(BQ)/P_(FR1)) of the amount of the benzoquinone present in the rubber composition (P_(BQ)), measured in parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, to the amount of free radical initiator present in the rubber composition (P_(FR1)), measured in parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, is from 0.05 to
 2. 8. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the benzoquinone is selected from methyl p-benzoquinone and tetrachloro p-benzoquinone.
 9. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the rubber composition is substantially free of organosulfur compounds.
 10. A golf ball consisting of: a solid, single-layer core having a diameter of from 1.51 inches to 1.59 inches and formed from a rubber composition comprising a base rubber and at least 0.15 parts by weight of a benzoquinone per 100 parts of the base rubber; and a cover.
 11. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein the core has a center hardness (H_(CENTER)) of 80 Shore C or less and a surface hardness (H_(SURFACE)) of greater than 80 Shore C, and wherein H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧25 Shore C units.
 12. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧30 Shore C units.
 13. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧40 Shore C units.
 14. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein H_(SURFACE)−H_(CENTER)≧45 Shore C units.
 15. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein the rubber composition additionally comprises at least 0.05 parts by weight of a free radical initiator per 100 parts of the base rubber, and wherein a ratio (P_(BQ)/P_(FR1)) of the amount of the benzoquinone present in the rubber composition (P_(BQ)), measured in parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, to the amount of free radical initiator present in the rubber composition (P_(FR1)), measured in parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber, is from 0.05 to
 2. 16. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein the benzoquinone is selected from methyl p-benzoquinone and tetrachloro p-benzoquinone.
 17. The golf ball of claim 10, wherein the rubber composition is substantially free of organosulfur compounds. 